ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2026
Analysis of the Ciliotoxic Effects of an Intranasal In Situ Ribavirin Delivery System: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.
Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intranasal route of drug administration offers a number of advantages, including the possibility of direct brain targeting while bypassing the blood-brain barrier. The local effect of an innovative ribavirin in situ gel on the nasal mucosa of outbred rats was investigated. Twelve formulations containing ion-sensitive polymers were evaluated in vitro and their physicochemical properties were assessed. The formulation containing 0.5% gellan gum and 2% Poloxamer-124 was recognized as optimal, exhibiting the most suitable technological characteristics. In vivo experiments confirmed the absence of irritating effect on the surface of the nasal mucosa in experimental animals. These findings highlight the potential of this dosage form for the treatment of brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41942666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.