ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of cadmium and lead as biomarkers of prostate cancer severity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between cadmium, lead exposure and prostate cancer by quantifying elemental concentrations in prostate biopsy tissue. Tissue samples were obtained from a total of 142 patients (64.8% black versus 35.2% white, mean age of 60.9 years, and mean BMI of 29.4) undergoing prostate biopsies. Only 11 (7.7%) of these patients had Gleason score of less than or equal to 6. Majority (59.2%) of them had a score of 3 + 4, 4 + 3 (19%), or higher (14.1%). Associations between tissue cadmium and age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and Gleason Score were evaluated. The median cadmium concentration (0.41 µg/g) was within previously reported ranges. No significant correlation was observed between cadmium and PSA or Gleason score (p > 0.05). Cadmium levels were significantly associated with age and smoking history and inversely correlated with BMI (p < 0.05). The median lead concentration of 0.03 µg/g was lower than literature values but showed a race-specific association with Gleason score (p < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that cadmium accumulation in prostate cancer reflects exposure history but does not track prostate cancer aggressiveness in this cohort. Lead was not associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, however a race-modified association between lead and Gleason score merits further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.