Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942662›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

Other Techniques.

Ana M Gonçalves, Marino F A Santos, Luís A Passarinha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana M Gonçalves *RISE-Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Health Science Faculty, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Marino F A Santos *UCIBIO - Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Luís A PassarinhaRISE-Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Health Science Faculty, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. lpassarinha@fcsaude.ubi.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of protein crystals suitable for high-resolution structural analysis critically depends on the quality, homogeneity, and functional integrity of the protein sample throughout the crystallization workflow. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of key biochemical and biophysical parameters that govern successful protein crystallization, including protein purity, conformational and compositional homogeneity, structural integrity, and biological activity. We discuss the application of different complementary techniques - including chromatographic methods, mass spectrometry, circular dichroism, surface plasmon resonance, and X-ray crystallography - to systematically assess and optimize these parameters from initial sample preparation to final crystal formation and subsequent X-ray data collection. By integrating orthogonal characterization approaches, common issues such as aggregation, degradation, conformational heterogeneity, and loss of function can be identified and mitigated prior to crystallization trials, thereby improving reproducibility and diffraction quality. Furthermore, the chapter highlights alternative X-ray data collection methodologies such as room-temperature, in situ, and automated data collection that further enhances crystallographic workflows by reducing crystal handling, improving experimental efficiency, and enabling the capture of biologically relevant conformational states.

Indexed as

ProteinsCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayMass SpectrometryProtein ConformationSurface Plasmon ResonanceProteinsBiological ActivityBiophysical TechniquesChromatographyProteinsPurity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.