Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942649›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

AI based ECG data recovery and cardiovascular diseases classification (CEDRC-network).

Muhammad Raheel Khan, Zunaib Maqsood Haider, Jawad Hussain, Masood Ahmad Khan, Saad Abdullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Raheel KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Zunaib Maqsood HaiderDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. zunaib.haider@iub.edu.pk.
Jawad HussainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Riphah College of Science and Technology, Riphah International University, Islamabad, 46000, Pakistan.
Masood Ahmad KhanInstitute of Cardiology Multan, Multan, Pakistan.
Saad AbdullahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mälardalens University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden. saad.abdullah@mdu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a significant and widespread cause of death in the world, continuing to increase mortality rates. Therefore, timely identification and diagnosis are essential for a patient's optimized recovery and longevity. In this regard, ECG is an effective tool for detecting anomalous heart conditions. However, interfering factors like noise, transient changes, and missing data could affect the accurate diagnosis of CVDs. The Cardiovascular ECG Data Recovery and Classification Network (CEDRC-Net) sorts and collates noisy data while also recovering missing data caused by equipment malfunction or human error, using a multistage machine-learning and deep-learning model. Moreover, CEDRC-Net is incorporated into the Transformer-based Convolutional Denoising Autoencoder (TCDAE) model to methodically mitigate noise, subsequently the Variational Autoencoder (VAE) or Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) are systematically employed as an alternative to accurately reconstruct and forecast ECG signals. Following this, the system classified heart diseases, including atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia, and tachycardia, using several machine-learning algorithms, based on data from a dataset comprising 2426 patients.TFT showcased better performance than VAE in ECG signal reconstruction, achieving up to 98% accuracy with Gradient Boosting, compared to 96% by VAE. Furthermore, in downstream classification, signals enhanced by TFT led to superior model results, with SVM and XGBoost both reaching 98.4% accuracy and F1-scores. The TFT achieved substantially lower reconstruction errors (MAE = 0.015, MSE = 0.00045, RMSE = 0.0132) compared to the VAE (MAE = 0.075, MSE = 0.011, RMSE = 0.107). These results highlight TFT's strong denoising capability for improving ECG diagnostic accuracy, while the suggested system ensures reliable measurements under noisy and non-ideal conditions. It is highly conducive for early and accurate diagnosis, better clinical decisions, and decreased patient load on the cardiologists. The research is performed on the MIMIC-IV-ECG 12-lead real-time dataset.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesElectrocardiographyAlgorithmsAutoencoderClassification AlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) MIMIC-IV-ECG datasetCardiovascular ECG data recovery and classification (CEDRC)Deep learning (DL)Electrocardiogram (ECG)Machine learning (ML)Waveform database (WFDB)

Identifiers

PMID41942649
PMCPMC13062089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.