ArticleScientific reports2026
AI based ECG data recovery and cardiovascular diseases classification (CEDRC-network).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ECG Signal Compression and Reconstruction Based on CNN-LSTM-Attention Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a significant and widespread cause of death in the world, continuing to increase mortality rates. Therefore, timely identification and diagnosis are essential for a patient's optimized recovery and longevity. In this regard, ECG is an effective tool for detecting anomalous heart conditions. However, interfering factors like noise, transient changes, and missing data could affect the accurate diagnosis of CVDs. The Cardiovascular ECG Data Recovery and Classification Network (CEDRC-Net) sorts and collates noisy data while also recovering missing data caused by equipment malfunction or human error, using a multistage machine-learning and deep-learning model. Moreover, CEDRC-Net is incorporated into the Transformer-based Convolutional Denoising Autoencoder (TCDAE) model to methodically mitigate noise, subsequently the Variational Autoencoder (VAE) or Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) are systematically employed as an alternative to accurately reconstruct and forecast ECG signals. Following this, the system classified heart diseases, including atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia, and tachycardia, using several machine-learning algorithms, based on data from a dataset comprising 2426 patients.TFT showcased better performance than VAE in ECG signal reconstruction, achieving up to 98% accuracy with Gradient Boosting, compared to 96% by VAE. Furthermore, in downstream classification, signals enhanced by TFT led to superior model results, with SVM and XGBoost both reaching 98.4% accuracy and F1-scores. The TFT achieved substantially lower reconstruction errors (MAE = 0.015, MSE = 0.00045, RMSE = 0.0132) compared to the VAE (MAE = 0.075, MSE = 0.011, RMSE = 0.107). These results highlight TFT's strong denoising capability for improving ECG diagnostic accuracy, while the suggested system ensures reliable measurements under noisy and non-ideal conditions. It is highly conducive for early and accurate diagnosis, better clinical decisions, and decreased patient load on the cardiologists. The research is performed on the MIMIC-IV-ECG 12-lead real-time dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.