Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942637›Full record

ArticleLab animal2026

Citric acid water as an alternative to food restriction to motivate task performance in mice during touchscreen testing.

Leila Dzinic, Olivia R Ghosh-Swaby, Joel Antolin, Julie R Dumont, Paul A S Sheppard, Timothy J Bussey, Lisa M Saksida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leila Dzinic *Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Olivia R Ghosh-Swaby *Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-8560
Joel AntolinUndergraduate Program in Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Julie R DumontBrainsCAN, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul A S SheppardRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. psheppa5@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-1446
Timothy J BusseyBrainsCAN, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-3709
Lisa M SaksidaBrainsCAN, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. lsaksida@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8416-8171

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) PJT 426966Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2019-06087Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2019-06102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent behavioral testing paradigms in touchscreen operant chambers have successfully provided insight into the neural mechanisms underlying various cognitive domains in healthy and disease models. Touchscreen testing has previously required food restriction to sufficiently motivate rodents to complete behavioral tests, limiting the use of interventions, for example, diet-based interventions, that alter animals' motivation for food in experimental design. Here we explored the safety and efficacy of water manipulation via the addition of citric acid in motivating behavioral performance in touchscreen operant chambers (1) in comparison with food restriction and (2) when mice are fed an obesogenic high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) diet. Water manipulation and food restriction produced similar performance on the progressive ratio task in nonobesogenic, standard-fed mice. However, when water-manipulated mice were fed an HFHS diet, they showed deficits in this motivation-sensitive task compared with standard chow-fed mice. Critically, all groups, regardless of restriction type or diet, showed similar learning curves during a pairwise visual discrimination task. Together, these findings demonstrate that water manipulation can safely and effectively motivate mice to perform touchscreen tasks for reward, even when fed a highly satiating HFHS diet, which opens the possibility of using interventions, especially diet-based interventions, in conjunction with touchscreen cognitive testing batteries.

Indexed as

Citric AcidMotivationWaterAnimalsConditioning, OperantFood DeprivationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCitric AcidWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.