ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of delayed first radioiodine therapy on response evaluation in intermediate risk differentiated thyroid cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) generally has a favorable prognosis; however, intermediate- and high-risk DTC may not progress positively. The optimal timing for radioactive iodine (RAI) after total thyroidectomy in intermediate-risk patients remains uncertain. we evaluated whether delaying RAI by > 6 months affected early treatment responses in 132 consecutive intermediate-risk patients with DTC treated between 2018 and 2022. Patients were grouped by surgery-to-RAI interval: ≤6 months (Group 1, n = 69) and > 6 months (Group 2, n = 63). Administered activities were 3,700 MBq or 5,550 MBq. The primary outcome was excellent response (ER) at 6‑month post‑treatment, per ATA‑2015 criteria. Multivariable logistic regression and 1:1 propensity score matching (age, sex, histology, multifocality, nodal status, and extrathyroidal extension) were used to address confounding factors. Sensitivity analyses included dose-stratified models. At 6 months, ER was more frequent in Group 1 than in Group 2 (35.6% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.049), while incomplete biochemical responses were higher in Group 2 (15% vs. 9.8%). After multivariable adjustment and in the propensity‑matched cohort (63 pairs), an RAI delay > 6 months remained associated with lower odds of ER (adjusted odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.74; p = 0.035). Aggressive histology and nodal metastasis independently reduced the likelihood of ER. The adverse effect of the delay appeared stronger among patients receiving 3,700 MBq, although the dose-time interaction was not statistically significant. The median follow‑up was 18 ± 6 months. In this cohort, RAI administration beyond 6 months was associated with a lower probability of excellent early response in intermediate-risk DTC, particularly in patients with nodal disease or aggressive histology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.