Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942599›Full record

ArticleBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology2026

Emerging Bacterial Resistance and Genotoxicity of Water-Soluble Fractions of Agricultural Soils from the Semiarid Region of Brazil Affected by the Continuous Use of Glyphosate.

Karolayne Silva Souza, Amanda Alves de Araujo, Milena Roberta Freire da Silva, Kátia Cilene da Silva Felix, Kaline Catiely Campos Silva, Ricardo Marques Nogueira Filho, Lívia Caroline Alexandre de Araujo, Amanda Vieira de Barros, Fabricio Motteran, Elvis Joacir De França and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karolayne Silva SouzaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Amanda Alves de AraujoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Milena Roberta Freire da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Kátia Cilene da Silva FelixCentro Universitário do Rio São Francisco, Paulo Afonso, Bahia, Brazil.
Kaline Catiely Campos SilvaCentro Universitário do Rio São Francisco, Paulo Afonso, Bahia, Brazil.
Ricardo Marques Nogueira FilhoUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Paulo Afonso, Bahia, Brazil.
Lívia Caroline Alexandre de AraujoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Amanda Vieira de BarrosUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Fabricio MotteranUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Elvis Joacir De FrançaCentro Regional de Ciências Nucleares do Nordeste, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Claudia RohdePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. claudia.rohde@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0977-9239
Maria Betânia Melo de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of herbicides in modern agriculture has been the subject of ongoing debate due to their negative impacts on the environment and human health. The aim of this study was to assess the bacterial, physicochemical and genotoxicity parameters of three soil samples of public farming settlements in Petrolândia, Brazil. The bacterial resistance patterns were examined after soil exposures to a known concentration of glyphosate (2.5%). Genotoxicity was assessed through the Drosophila melanogaster Comet assay, exposed to water-soluble fraction (WSF) soil samples, followed by the quantification of seven chemical elements. The results indicated that, although physicochemical parameters remained within acceptable limits, there was a significant presence of resistant bacteria, particularly Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Bacillus cereus and Enterobacter cloacae. Comet assay results (Damage Index and Damage Frequency) presented a significant level of genotoxicity in two of the three WSFs. Clustering analysis associated the genetic damage to the presence of chrome and zinc heavy metals. The predominance of multidrug-resistant bacteria, combined with levels of genotoxicity, suggests that these soils exposed to glyphosate contamination represents a risk to the sustainability of Brazilian semiarid agriculture.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialGlycineHerbicidesSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsAgricultureAnimalsBacteriaBrazilComet AssayDNA DamageEnvironmental MonitoringGlyphosateSoilGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesSoilSoil PollutantsComet assayDrosophila melanogasterMicrobiotaPesticidesPetrolândia

Identifiers

PMID41942599
PMCPMC13053334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.