ArticleScientific reports2026
Utilizing deep learning algorithms and artificial neural networks to forecast the viscosity, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity of Fe
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning provides a powerful approach for predicting the complex thermophysical properties of nanofluids. This study employs a suite of machine learning algorithms to forecast the viscosity, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity of a Fe₃O₄/TiO₂ magnetic nanofluid, using experimental data over the temperature range of 10-50 °C and volume fractions of 0-0.3%. Among Gaussian Process Regression, Multiple Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, and Multiple Polynomial Regression (MPR), the MPR model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a correlation coefficient above 0.99 and the lowest error metrics (e.g., Root Mean Square Error of 0.0216 for viscosity). Subsequent multi-objective optimization using the Multi-objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (MOGWO) generated a Pareto front of optimal solutions. The most balanced solution, identified using entropy-based weighting, corresponded to a configuration of 60 wolves and 300 iterations. This integrated framework accurately predicts the thermophysical properties and identifies optimal trade-offs for engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.