ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent performance prediction of nanoparticle-enhanced automotive radiator cooling using CFD and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active thermal control of automotive engines is vital for improving performance, robustness and conventional coolants like water and air frequently bring insufficient heat dissipation. To counterpart this ill effect, the propose study examines and investigate the performance enrichment of an automotive radiator using Al₂O₃–ethylene glycol (EG) nanofluids concluded by collective numerical, experimental, and data-driven approach. Initially, three-dimensional radiator model was developed using AUTOCAD software and computational study was performed in ANSYS-FLUENT, using a pressure-based model and a realizable k–ε turbulence model. The Grid-independence test was directed to ensure numerical accuracy, and CFD predictions were experimentally validated through experimental radiator test rig. The CFD result for pure EG predicted an outlet temperature of 70.11 °C that was closely agreed with the experimental value of 69.11 °C confirming the consistency of the numerical model. The blend of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles significantly enhanced heat transfer characteristics, whereas growing nanoparticle blend leads to progressive reductions in outlet temperature. At 2% concentration, the outlet temperature reduced to 65.51 °C, while the maximum cooling performance was achieved at 5% concentration, yielding an outlet temperature of 60.87 °C. Although the pressure drop amplified moderately with nanoparticle loading—from 36.79 Pa at 1% to 38.72 Pa at 5%, the rise remained relatively small, representing a constructive trade-off between thermal enhancement and hydraulic disadvantage. The highest PEC value of 1.83 was obtained at 5% Al₂O₃ concentration, demonstrating that the enhancement in heat transfer outweighs the associated pressure drop penalty. In addition, a machine learning based predictive framework has been proposed in the present work. This outline has been developed to evaluate the radiator outlet temperature and pressure drop using nanoparticle concentration and functioning settings that helped in rapid performance prediction and parametric optimization. Overall, the combined CFD, experimental, and data-driven findings shows that Al₂O₃–EG nanofluids are a capable coolant choice for high-performance radiator cooling applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.