ArticleScientific reports2026
Bioanalytical method development and validation of isosorbide mononitrate in human plasma by using LC-MS/MS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze Isosorbide Mononitrate in human plasma, a highly sensitive and accurate LC–MS/MS bioanalytical method was developed and validated using Isosorbide mononitrate-¹³C₆ as the internal standard. Validate a suitable analytical method for the estimation of unknown drug concentrations in plasma. It can be used for the quantitation of isosorbide mononitrate in K₂EDTA human plasma for bioequivalence and bioavailability studies. The method was found to be specific, sensitive, linear, precise, accurate, and reproducible for the extraction and analysis of isosorbide mononitrate in K₂EDTA human plasma samples over the investigated concentration range of 5.000 ng/mL to 1800.000 ng/mL using a processing volume of 0.100 mL. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a 2 mM ammonium acetate (acidified) mobile phase with acetonitrile containing 0.1% acetic acid in a ratio of 55:45 (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Detection was carried out using multiple reaction monitoring with transitions (m/z) of 249.90 → 59.00 for isosorbide mononitrate and 255.90 → 58.90 for the internal standard. The analytes were detected using tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The proposed method was comprehensively validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, sensitivity, recovery, and stability, with results meeting the acceptance criteria. The developed and validated method was found to be simpler, faster, more specific, precise, and cost-effective compared with previously reported methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.