ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-omics analysis of interspecies interactions in a soil Streptomyces community provides functional insights into siderophore ecology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Considering internal conflict in the face of natural product biosynthesis and biosynthetic gene cluster evolution.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Streptomyces are key contributors to soil microbiome function, known for their biosynthetic diversity. While advances in -omics technologies have improved our understanding of microbiome composition and metabolic potential, the mechanisms underpinning interspecies interactions remain poorly resolved. Here, we investigate the molecular basis of interactions among four sympatric Streptomyces soil microbiome isolates, focusing on phenotypic, metabolomic and transcriptomic responses. Co-culture experiments revealed that one isolate, strain A, exhibited pronounced phenotypic changes when grown alongside each of the other three strains. Untargeted metabolomics and RNA-seq analyses showed that strain A undergoes distinct metabolic and transcriptional shifts depending on its partner, with the strongest response elicited by strain C. Despite all four strains possessing a conserved desferrioxamine biosynthetic gene cluster, only strain C constitutively produced desferrioxamine B (DFO-B), a hydroxamate siderophore, indicating a role for iron bioavailability in the interaction. Supplementation with DFO-B or iron mimicked the growth stimulation of strain A observed in co-culture with strain C, and CRISPR base editing of desD in strain C abolished both DFO production and the phenotypic induction of strain A. However, transcriptomic profiles of strain A varied significantly depending on the partner strain, with distinct sets of biosynthetic gene clusters and metabolic pathways activated in response to strains B and C, suggesting additional cues beyond DFO-B. In contrast, strain D did not elicit growth stimulation in its partners, and itself showed downregulation of amino acid and carbon metabolism when co-cultured with strain C. These findings indicate that Streptomyces interactions are not only mediated by siderophore piracy but also involve complex, strain-specific molecular responses. Our findings demonstrate that Streptomyces interactions are highly strain-specific and only partly mediated by siderophore piracy, with DFO-B acting as a potent interspecies cue. The divergent molecular responses to different partners suggest nuanced mechanisms of microbial sensing and competition. These insights advance our understanding of microbial crosstalk and highlight the ecological and evolutionary complexity of siderophore-mediated interactions. By integrating transcriptomics, metabolomics, and biochemical assays, we present a robust framework for dissecting microbial interactions, with implications for microbiome engineering and synthetic community design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.