ArticleScientific reports2026
Wavelet-enhanced autoencoder based image denoising with CNN fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In biomedical imaging, noise is a fundamental problem negatively impacting diagnostic quality, and effective noise reduction methods are critical for preserving structural details. This study proposes a hybrid noise reduction framework integrated with a CNN-based fusion network, combining a convolutional autoencoder, a specially designed hybrid wavelet filtering approach, and multi-level adaptive wavelet transformation. The autoencoder component learns clean image matches from noisy inputs, while the wavelet-based arm ensures the preservation of high-frequency structural and textural information through multi-level decomposition. The CNN-based fusion module adaptively combines these complementary representations to produce the final enhanced image. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method provides consistent superiority across different noise types and datasets. In the fetal ultrasound dataset, the highest performance was achieved at all levels under Gaussian and speckle noise; for speckle noise low-level PSNR values of 48.12 dB and SSIM of 0.99 were obtained. For brain tumor MR dataset, the method was effective not only under Gaussian and speckle noise but also under Rician noise; the PSNR value was obtained as 22.90 dB at the low level, 27.11 dB at the medium level, and 22.17 dB at the high level, with corresponding SSIM values of 0.90, 0.59, and 0.47. Furthermore, in non-referenced evaluations performed on the wrist trauma clinical X-ray dataset, mean NIQE = 3.12 and SSEQ = 0.26 values were obtained. These results confirm that the proposed approach offers balanced and generalizable denoising performance without excessive smoothing or the creation of artificial artifacts on real clinical images. These findings demonstrate that combining wavelet-based detail preservation with deep learning-based reconstruction delivers robust and reliable noise reduction performance across diverse biomedical imaging modalities and noise types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.