ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-informed graph neural networks for real-time prediction of wall shear stress in stenotic coronary arteries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wall shear stress (WSS) is a key hemodynamic parameter associated with atherosclerotic plaque development in coronary arteries. In this study, we developed a physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) for efficient prediction of WSS distributions on stenotic coronary surfaces. Leveraging 40 subject-specific geometries reconstructed from coronary CT angiography, we employed statistical shape modeling to generate a cohort of 1000 synthetic models encompassing systematic variations in stenosis morphology (concentric and eccentric lesions, round and oval cross-sections, single and dual stenoses). Full computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to obtain ground-truth WSS data, which were then mapped onto vessel-surface graphs to train the proposed PI-GNN. The PI-GNN outperformed U-Net (R = 0.85) and multilayer perceptron (R = 0.24) baselines, achieving superior global performance (MAE = 1.05 Pa, RMSE = 5.63 Pa, R = 0.94) while maintaining robust accuracy across all stenosis scenarios. Node-wise Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated negligible mean bias (|bias|< 2 Pa) and narrow 95% limits of agreement, indicating reliable local agreement with CFD, even in complex severe and dual-lesion cases. With inference times reduced to seconds, the proposed PI-GNN serves as a computationally efficient surrogate for real-time clinical decision support and large-scale coronary hemodynamic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.