ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of temperature, brine, and inhibitor chemistry on emulsion stability in gas condensate systems under pipeline mixing conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oil and gas production, the coexistence of water and condensate in subsea pipelines often leads to emulsion formation, complicating separation processes and increasing operational challenges in flow assurance. Emulsions can be stabilized or destabilized depending on temperature, salinity, inhibitor chemistry, and water cut, yet their combined effects remain poorly understood. This study investigates the emulsification tendency and phase behavior of South Pars condensates (SPD10 and SPD15) under pipeline-representative mixing. Experiments were conducted at condensate-to-water ratios of 4:1 and 2:2, across four temperatures (12, 30, 45, and 70 °C). Samples were agitated with controlled high-shear pulses, and separated water and emulsion volumes were monitored at different settling times. Results show that at low temperature (12 °C), corrosion inhibitor (CI) with brine produced large but short-lived emulsions (~ 165 mL at 5 min decreasing to ~ 71 mL at 1 h), while kinetic hydrate inhibitor alone did not generate stable emulsions. At higher water cuts (2:2), CI with brine generated much larger emulsions, up to ~ 195 mL initially and ~ 20 mL remaining after 24 h, compared with rapid collapse when deionized water was used. At 70 °C, emulsions diminished and sludge-like interfacial layers dominated. Thermal path also influenced stability, as heating produced larger emulsions than cooling at the same set point. MEG/MDEA blends acted as non-emulsifiers but consistently produced sludge. Overall, the findings highlight CI–brine interactions as the main driver of emulsion and sludge formation. Water cut and thermal history strongly affect stability, offering insights for inhibitor screening and flow-assurance design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.