ArticleScientific reports2026
Development, validation, and visualization of a novel nomogram for predicting clinical outcomes of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a context-aware multi-instance learning (TransMIL) model based on whole-slide pathological images and integrate it with clinical parameters, thereby constructing a multimodal model for prognostic prediction in postoperative cervical cancer patients. Data (including pathological images and clinical information) were collected from patients diagnosed with cervical cancer via pathological examination who underwent surgery at the First Medical Centre of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between May 2017 and May 2023. After integration and screening, 374 patients were enrolled. To maximize the use of all available samples and obtain a robust performance estimate, we employed a rigorous patient-level nested five-fold cross-validation strategy for model development and evaluation. The CLAM algorithm was employed for attention-based, interpretable foreground segmentation. By integrating TransMIL with global context encoding techniques, spatial dependencies of tissue structures were captured to extract deep image features. And fused them with clinical features to predict the prognosis of patients. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the C-index. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Model performance was further evaluated using calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. The predictive model integrating clinical-pathological characteristics demonstrated favourable prognostic capability. Models based on pathological images alone and combined clinical-Pathomics Models were used to predict 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. For OS prediction, the clinical-Pathomics Model achieved a C-index of 0.700, outperforming the pathomic model (C-index: 0.631) and the clinical model(C-index: 0.690). Similarly, for DFS prediction, the clinical-Pathomics Model (C-index: 0.626) surpassed the pathomic model (C-index: 0.549). Based on model nomogram scores, patients were effectively stratified into high-risk and low-risk cohorts, with Kaplan-Meier curves revealing statistically significant differences in survival rates between groups. Further evaluation via time-dependent ROC analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's robust predictive accuracy and clinical applicability. A clinical-Pathomics Model was developed to predict 3-year and 5-year DFS and OS in postoperative cervical cancer patients. This model represents a promising approach for for patient risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.