ArticleScientific reports2026
Metabolomics of mouth-rinsed water for assessing psychophysiological stress in office workers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workplace stress impacts productivity and health, necessitating non-invasive, rapid, and objective assessment methods. This study investigates the potential of metabolite profiling of mouth-rinsed water (MW)-an oral biofluid collected in just 10 s-as a screening tool for psychophysiological stress among office workers. Thirty-two participants were classified into high-stress and control groups based on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire, and objective physiological measures. MW samples were collected at four time points, including before and after brief mental stress tasks. Biochemical features were profiled using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A total of 559 analytes, including 532 water-soluble metabolites, 25 steroids, and 2 salivary proteins, were measured, of which 127 analytes with acceptable analytical precision were selected for subsequent analyses. Statistically significant differences in numerous metabolites indicated stress-associated alterations in metabolic activity. Notably, a predictive model using the ratio of N-acetyl-β-alanine to asymmetric dimethylarginine achieved high accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.845 for identifying high stress. The distinct metabolite dynamics under varying stress conditions suggest multiple stress-response mechanisms. These findings underscore MW metabolite profiling as a promising approach for assessing and managing workplace stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.