ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-guided contrastive temporal graph learning for anomaly detection and root-cause localization in industrial control systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial control systems generate complex multivariate time series and detecting anomalies without labelled attacks is still difficult. In this work we propose a physics guided contrastive temporal graph learning framework for anomaly detection and root-cause localization in ICS. The method follows three main steps. First, a self-supervised contrastive encoder is trained only on normal data to learn robust representations of sensor windows. Augmented views of the same signal are used so that normal behaviour is pulled together in latent space. Second, a physics guided graph is built from the plant P&ID where sensors and actuators are nodes and physical dependencies form edges. Third, a temporal graph module operates on the learned embeddings to capture both time evolution and cross-sensor relations. Anomaly score is computed from graph representations and node level scores are used to rank possible root causes. Experiments on ICS dataset show higher detection performance than LSTM-AE and CNN-AE baselines. Additional robustness tests such as distribution shift, sensor drift and missing channels are conducted to study practical behaviour. The main innovation of this work is the combination of contrastive learning with physics guided graph reasoning without using any attack labels, and the ability to provide interpretable sensor ranking for operators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.