ArticleScientific reports2026
Impacts of variable operating conditions on flux and energy efficiency of air gap membrane distillation for brine management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this research paper, we investigate the efficiency of brine treatment using Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) under varying operational conditions. The study evaluates the performance of the AGMD by examining key metrics, i.e., flux, Salt Rejection Rate (SRR), and Specific Thermal Energy Consumption (STEC) across different flow rates starting from 0.5 L/min to 3.0 L/min and brine salinities ranging from 45 to 65 g/L. To ensure a comprehensive assessment, the membrane was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging and Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), both before and after 72 h of testing, providing insights into morphological changes and fouling. Flux varied between 4.7 and 14.0 kg/h/m2, SRR ranged from 80 to 99.9%, and STEC values were lowest at 1.0 L/min. Optimal performance was observed at 2.0 L/min with brine concentration up to 55 g/L, achieving flux of 9.8 kg/h/m2, SRR > 98%, and STEC between 28,793 and 46,069 kWh/m2. SEM and FTIR analysis further highlight the impact of operational parameters on membrane integrity and durability. Experiments were limited to six-hour runs, sufficient for initial fouling dynamics but not long-term degradation. This study offers valuable contributions to the optimization of AGMD processes, aiming to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of desalination technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.