ArticleUrology research & practice2026
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBenign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the traditional surgical standard, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative. Evidence comparing both techniques in small prostates (<50 mL) remains limited.
methodsThis retrospective study included male patients aged 40-80 years who underwent bipolar TURP (B-TURP) or HoLEP between 2023 and 2025 for LUTS refractory to medical therapy, with prostate volume <50 mL. Pre- and postoperative parameters, including operative time, resected tissue weight, irrigation volume, hospital stay, catheterization time, and functional scores (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR)) were compared.
resultsNo significant differences were found between groups regarding age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, ICIQ-SF scores, IIEF-5, complication rates, or postoperative hemoglobin decrease (all P > .05). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate showed longer operative time, greater irrigation use, and higher resected tissue weight/percentage (P = .03, .02, <.001, <.001), while hospital stay and catheterization were shorter (both P < .001). Both procedures improved Qmax and IPSS and reduced PVR (all P < .001); the increase in Qmax was greater in HoLEP (P = .025).
conclusionBoth B-TURP and HoLEP are safe and effective for small prostates; however, HoLEP offers advantages in resected tissue weight, Qmax improvement, and shorter hospital stay/catheterization. Cite this article as: G.lbaşı A, Elmaağa. B, Bi.er H, .zercan AY, Günal S, Keske M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs. bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for small-volume prostates: A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2025;51(6):225-229.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.