Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942283›Full record

ArticleContact dermatitis2026

Contact Sensitization in Patients With Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Patch Test Results With an Extended Baseline Series in Consecutive Patients.

María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto, María Elena Gatica Ortega, Anna María Giménez-Arnau, Tatiana Sanz-Sánchez, Pedro Mercader García, Inmaculada Ruíz-González, Gemma Melé-Ninot, Pablo Chicharro, Paloma Sánchez-Pedreño, Marina de Vega and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

María-Antonia Pastor-NietoDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
María Elena Gatica OrtegaEscuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad de Castilla-La-Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-5834
Anna María Giménez-ArnauDermatology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Tatiana Sanz-SánchezDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Mercader GarcíaDermatology Department, Hospital General Universitario José Ma Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Inmaculada Ruíz-GonzálezDermatology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Gemma Melé-NinotDermatology Department, Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, Grupo Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0365-0634
Pablo ChicharroDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Paloma Sánchez-PedreñoDermatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Spain.
Marina de VegaUnidad de Investigación, Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV), Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Gallego DescalzoUnidad de Investigación, Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV), Madrid, Spain.
Leopoldo BorregoDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Funding

Leo PharmaSanofiThe Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContact sensitization has been reported in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA).

objectivesTo analyse sensitization in FFA-patients and the improvement of symptoms after allergen avoidance.

methodsWe performed patch tests with an extended baseline series in FFA-patients across Spain and assessed the allergen avoidance impact.

results133 FFA-patients were investigated. 97% were women. At least one positive allergen was found in 77/133 (58%). No differences were detected in the frequency of positive results compared with the population without FFA patch tested with an extended baseline series in the same period (52.3%) (p = 0.21). Having FFA was associated with being sensitized to propolis, shellac, and gallate mixture. Thirteen (9.8%) patients showed sensitization to salicylates, which was associated with subjective symptoms of intolerance to sunscreens or sun exposure. No evidence of clinical improvement was identified with allergen avoidance 4 months after patch testing.

conclusionNo sufficient evidence was found to justify routine patch testing in FFA patients, as no evidence of clinical improvement was identified by allergen avoidance and the relevance of FFA-associated sensitizations was largely uncertain. Patch testing with salicylates may be of interest in FFA-patients with subjective symptoms of intolerance to sun exposure or sunscreens.

Indexed as

AllergensAlopeciaDermatitis, Allergic ContactAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatch TestsSalicylatesSunscreening AgentsAllergensSalicylatesSunscreening Agentsallergic contact dermatitisethylhexyl salicylatefrontal fibrosing alopeciagallatepatch testshellac

Identifiers

PMID41942283
PMCPMC13327212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.