SynthesisBMJ open2026
Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive outcomes among older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWhile adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been consistently linked to poorer cognitive outcomes in later life, far less is known about ACEs' contribution to dementia and cognitive ageing risk in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite their growing and disproportionate share of global Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) burden. This study aimed to systematically review existing evidence on the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 years and older in LMIC settings.
designSystematic review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCE: We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from the inception of each database to January 2026. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies examining the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 and older in LMICs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened each record, assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool and extracted data. Results were illustrated using descriptive forest plots and a narrative synthesis.
resultsOur systematic review included 14 studies, primarily from upper-middle-income countries, that assessed the relationship between individual ACEs and cognitive impairment (n=4) and function (n=10). 10 studies reported significant associations between ACEs and poorer cognitive function and increased risk of cognitive impairment. No study assessed the association between ACEs and ADRD. Parental death, neglect and mental health issues in the family showed consistent associations with cognitive outcomes, whereas experiencing hunger and poor health in childhood showed inconsistent associations.
conclusionsOur review corroborated evidence from high-income countries that exposure to ACEs is associated with a long-term risk of poorer cognitive outcomes among older populations in LMICs. However, the available literature remains limited, with most studies originating from upper-middle-income countries, few examining cognitive impairment and none assessing ADRD. These findings underscore substantial gaps in knowledge and highlight the need for research across diverse LMIC settings to clarify the role of broader psychosocial and contextual childhood experiences in shaping cognitive ageing and dementia risk. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024501816.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.