Trial reportPediatrics2026
Clinician Perceptions of the Impact of Switching HPV Vaccine Initiation to 9-10 Years.
Trial report in Pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAlthough HPV vaccine initiation as early as aged 9 years has been recommended, most clinicians initiate at ages 11 to 12 years. We assessed clinician-reported impact of early initiation on parental responses and vaccine discussions.
methodsAs part of an ongoing cluster randomized pragmatic trial across 31 Colorado and California pediatric practices, we allocated practices to switch HPV vaccine initiation to ages 9 to 10 years or to enhanced usual care (initiation at ages 11 to 12 years). All clinicians received online training on improving HPV vaccination; intervention arm clinicians also received training on initiating at ages 9 to 10 years. We surveyed all clinicians in both arms at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months (all >80% response rates), and queried clinicians in the ages 9 to 10 years arm about vaccination at ages 9 to 10 vs 11 to 12 years.
resultsAlmost all intervention arm clinicians switched rapidly to the ages 9 to 10 years initiation; most control clinicians remained at ages 11 to 12 years. Parental concerns/questions, pushback, hesitancy, and adherence to recommendations did not differ significantly between study arms and were similar at ages 9 to 10 vs 11 to 12 years among intervention arm clinicians. Only about one-tenth of clinicians in both arms brought up sexual activity during HPV vaccine discussions; two-thirds in both arms indicated parents sometimes/often did. Intervention arm clinicians were more likely than controls to state discussions were shorter by a lot/little (55% vs 37%, P = .005) since study initiation.
conclusionsInitiating HPV vaccination at ages 9 to 10 years instead of ages 11 to 12 years had little impact on parental questions/concerns, pushback, hesitancy, or clinicians' ability to convince hesitant parents. Initiation at ages 9 to 10 years was perceived by clinicians to shorten HPV vaccine discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.