ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Role of the stromal and immune microenvironment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The instructive scar - the dynamic role of extracellular matrix in biliary pathophysiology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Review
- Advances in the Molecular Mechanisms of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of Biomarkers, Regulatory Pathways and Tumor Microenvironment Reprogramming.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is one of the deadliest malignancies, with an overall 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. For decades, surgery and chemotherapy have represented the only treatment options for early- and late-stage disease, respectively. More recently, characterisation of the genomic landscape of iCCA has identified several "druggable" oncogenic drivers and led to the FDA approval of the first targeted therapies, including FGFR and IDH inhibitors, for second-line treatment in genetically defined patient subsets. Nonetheless, most patients treated with these therapies rapidly develop resistance and eventually experience disease progression. At a time when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are profoundly reshaping cancer treatment, their use in combination with chemotherapy has yielded only modest survival benefits in iCCA, with more than two-thirds of patients exhibiting intrinsic resistance. The aggressive and refractory nature of this cancer is often attributed to its intricate tumour microenvironment (TME); however, the complex interplay between tumour cells and other TME components (i.e. immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and endothelial cells), as well as the molecular and cellular mechanisms driving tumour progression and therapeutic resistance, remain poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the critical role of the stromal and immune TME in iCCA and how its characterisation has informed patient stratification and molecular classification. We also describe recent findings supporting distinct genotype-immunophenotype relationships in iCCA, as well as the existence of functionally heterogeneous subsets of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Ultimately, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge while stimulating discussion on therapeutic implications and future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.