ArticleBlood advances2026
Cure Sickle Cell Initiative recommendations on common data elements for sickle cell disease gene therapy trials.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe Cure Sickle Cell Initiative (CureSCi), created by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, has developed data standards to increase interoperability and meta-analysis of studies specifically investigating gene therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). The aims of the CureSCi Common Data Elements (CDE) initiative are to facilitate the development of safe, effective, and accessible gene therapies. Five working groups (WGs) comprising people living with SCD, stakeholders, clinicians, and researchers reviewed current definitions used for SCD clinical studies, including those from the American Society of Hematology, US Food and Drug Administration, PhenX catalog of consensus measures for phenotypes and exposures, and others. The WGs met over 1.5 years to develop a comprehensive list of defined data points and variables recommended for any gene therapy clinical trial that incorporated feedback from a 60-day public review period. The SCD CDEs are publicly available on the CureSCi (curesickle.org/datatools-overview) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Repository (cde.nlm.nih.gov/home) websites. In addition to data elements, there are 42 instrument recommendations, including those from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and NIH Toolbox, and 49 template case report forms for various stages of a study (eg, demographic, disease history, treatment, and outcome). CureSCi data element recommendations build upon current consensus data elements and facilitate the start-up of multicenter clinical research efforts. This standardized set of clinical research recommendations will increase the ability to compare outcomes across studies, increase data quality, and help educate new clinical investigators in the field of SCD gene therapy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.