ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Quick response codes in the breakfast cereal aisle: prevalence, landing page, and product characteristics.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital labelling technologies, including quick response (QR) codes, are increasingly used in the global packaged food supply to provide additional product information. While regulation in most jurisdictions requires essential nutrition and ingredient information to be displayed directly on the physical label, concerns exist among researchers and consumer groups that QR codes may come to replace these key details, limiting access to essential information required for informed decision-making. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of QR codes on breakfast cereals in Australia, the types of information the codes provide and the healthfulness (measured by Health Star Rating and Nova systems) of products that feature them. In a sample of 483 breakfast cereals, 16% displayed QR codes, most frequently located on the back of the pack (72%). There were no significant differences between products with or without QR codes in median Health Star Rating (4.0 vs. 4.0; P = .832) or the proportion of ultra-processed products (83% vs. 76%; P = .136). QR codes were primarily linked to websites promoting the product (e.g. 80% featured product recipes), with none providing nutrition information besides claims. Our study provides evidence that, although QR codes are not yet widespread on breakfast cereals in Australia, they are currently being used mostly as additional marketing space rather than to provide key nutrition information to consumers. Their prevalence may increase as digital labelling technologies gain momentum globally. Regulatory oversight that prioritizes access to key nutrition information is important to ensure consumers can easily access the information required to make informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.