Trial reportESC heart failure2026
Association between functional Status and cardiac function in chronic heart failure: insights from the C-MIC II Trial.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRelationship between changes in cardiac function, functional capacity, and patient-reported health status in heart failure (HF) remains incompletely defined, which may help inform endpoint selection and clarify how distinct clinical domains reflect treatment response.
methodsThis post hoc analysis of the randomized cardiac microcurrent (C-MIC) II trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of C-MIC therapy in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction on optimal guideline-directed medical therapy, included 65 ambulatory patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV symptoms, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25-35%. Correlations between changes in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), core lab-assessed LVEF (primary measure) and site-assessed LVEF, and peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) were evaluated at 4 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 6 months using Pearson coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsThe mean age was 60.0 ± 9.7 years and baseline LVEF was 29.8 ± 3.3%. Baseline 6MWD was 291.4 ± 61.6 m and KCCQ-OSS was 42.6 ± 22.7. From baseline to 6 months, changes in KCCQ-OSS (n = 63) and 6MWD (n = 61) showed modest correlations with core lab-assessed LVEF (r = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.16-0.58; P = .0015 and r = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15-0.58; P = .0022, respectively). Changes in KCCQ-OSS and 6MWD correlated strongly (n = 62; r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46-0.76; P < .0001). Changes in KCCQ-OSS and 6MWD did not correlate significantly with changes in peak VO2 (P = .06 and P = .30, respectively). Changes in LVEF and peak VO2 (n = 55) demonstrated modest correlation (r = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.16-0.61; P = .002). Baseline correlations with peak VO2 were weak to modest but increased at 6 months for LVEF (n = 59; r = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35-0.71; P < .0001).
conclusionIn advanced HF, improvements in health status and submaximal functional capacity associate modestly with LVEF, while LVEF correlates more closely with peak VO2. Cardiac function, functional capacity, and health status represent related but distinct domains, supporting multidimensional assessment in HF trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.