ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Chatbot Usability Scale in Chinese Users: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chatbots are increasingly deployed across various domains; however, systematic evaluation of their usability remains limited, particularly in non-Western contexts. The 11-item Chatbot Usability Scale (BUS-11), a multidimensional instrument grounded in human-computer interaction theory, has demonstrated strong psychometric properties in prior studies; however, a validated Chinese version does not exist, despite China being one of the largest chatbot markets. Objective: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the BUS-11 for Chinese users. Methods: Following established cross-cultural adaptation procedures, the scale was forward- and back-translated, reviewed by an expert committee, and pilot-tested for clarity and feasibility. A main validation study was then conducted with 214 participants, who completed 438 evaluations of the chatbots across 10 widely used systems. Results: Psychometric analyses demonstrated excellent scale-level content validity index (ie, 0.92), strong internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.92), and a clear 3-factor structure (Accessibility, Interaction Process Quality, and Information Quality), explaining 56.1% of the variance. Meanwhile, privacy or security and response time were retained as single-item indicators. The Chinese BUS-11 was concise, user-friendly, and psychometrically robust. Conclusions: This work fills a critical gap by providing the first validated instrument for assessing chatbot usability in Chinese contexts, enabling reliable cross-cultural comparisons and supporting both research and practical design evaluation in human-computer interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.