Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941510›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

The implementation realities of a digital antenatal care improvement intervention: Insights from ethnographic work in primary health facilities in Nepal.

Sulata Karki, Seema Das, Emma Radovich, Abha Shrestha, Rajani Shakya, Abha Shrestha, Ona L McCarthy, Oona M R Campbell, Biraj Man Karmacharya, Loveday Penn-Kekana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sulata KarkiDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2141-1517
Seema DasDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Emma RadovichLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, United Kingdom.
Abha ShresthaDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Rajani ShakyaDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Abha ShresthaDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Ona L McCarthyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, United Kingdom.
Oona M R CampbellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, United Kingdom.
Biraj Man KarmacharyaDhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Research and Development Division, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Loveday Penn-KekanaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nepal has significantly improved maternal health service coverage, including antenatal care (ANC), with a growing focus on quality care. The mobile health Integrated Rural Antenatal care (mIRA) project evaluated an electronic decision support system (EDSS) to improve ANC quality in primary healthcare facilities. This sub-study was undertaken within the context of a mixed-method evaluation. It aimed to explore how auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) implemented the EDSS and to provide insight into the real-world challenges and processes of the mIRA implementation project. We conducted a focused ethnography in four primary health facilities, where ANMs implemented the EDSS. Data were collected between December 2021 and January 2023 and involved repeat ethnographic observations, informal conversations, formal interviews (n = 16), and validation workshops for participants to respond to and reflect on findings. The data were analyzed thematically, drawing on street-level bureaucracy theory. ANMs verbalized they valued the EDSS, but this was not reflected in their use of it. ANMs adopted the EDSS primarily for recordkeeping and did not comply with care recommendations that conflicted with their usual way of working. ANMs viewed themselves as providing care for normal pregnancies and believed that quality was not an issue, as they felt they were already delivering good care at their level. This perception, coupled with a risk-averse attitude, led them to refer cases to doctors or higher centers rather than implement the EDSS recommendations. The EDSS recommendations to improve the quality of ANC did not align well with ANMs' usual practices, which were influenced by contextual factors and the complexities of organizing ANC in primary health facilities. By triangulating longitudinal data collected through multiple methods, the study provided a comprehensive insight into ANC provision in Nepal, revealing the challenges associated with improving quality, unpacking the realities of intervention implementation, and highlighting the disconnects between rhetoric and practice.

Identifiers

PMID41941510
PMCPMC13052878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.