ArticlePloS one2026
The role of personality traits and moral disengagement in academic dishonesty: An analysis of the big five and the dark tetrad.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic dishonesty - the inclination to cheat, falsify and plagiarise in the academic environment - is a growing concern in society, influenced by multiple psychological factors. This study aims to examine the role of personality traits (Big Five and Dark Tetrad) in academic dishonesty and exploratory analyses of potential mediating mechanisms, including of moral disengagement, in these relationships. A sample of 175 undergraduate students (Mage = 21.88 years, SDage = 5.23) completed self-report measures, including traditional and gamified personality assessments. Results showed that extraversion, openness to experience, and responsibility traits (gamified measure) were negatively associated with academic dishonesty, while neuroticism and Dark Tetrad traits were positively related to academic dishonesty. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that lack of moral disengagement may play a role in these personality-dishonesty relationships. These results highlight the psychological mechanisms underlying academic dishonesty behaviours, emphasising the need to examine personality not only through traditional measures, but through gamified assessments in the age of emerging technologies. Interventions targeting moral disengagement warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.