Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941508›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The role of personality traits and moral disengagement in academic dishonesty: An analysis of the big five and the dark tetrad.

Julia Sánchez-García, Jorge Cebrián, Elena Fernández-Del-Río, Pedro J Ramos-Villagrasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia Sánchez-GarcíaDefense University Center of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-0327
Jorge CebriánDepartment of History and Social Sciences Applied to Design, Aragon School of Design, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0437-0839
Elena Fernández-Del-RíoDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza. Faculty of Labour and Social Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pedro J Ramos-VillagrasaDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza. Faculty of Labour and Social Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-4097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic dishonesty - the inclination to cheat, falsify and plagiarise in the academic environment - is a growing concern in society, influenced by multiple psychological factors. This study aims to examine the role of personality traits (Big Five and Dark Tetrad) in academic dishonesty and exploratory analyses of potential mediating mechanisms, including of moral disengagement, in these relationships. A sample of 175 undergraduate students (Mage = 21.88 years, SDage = 5.23) completed self-report measures, including traditional and gamified personality assessments. Results showed that extraversion, openness to experience, and responsibility traits (gamified measure) were negatively associated with academic dishonesty, while neuroticism and Dark Tetrad traits were positively related to academic dishonesty. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that lack of moral disengagement may play a role in these personality-dishonesty relationships. These results highlight the psychological mechanisms underlying academic dishonesty behaviours, emphasising the need to examine personality not only through traditional measures, but through gamified assessments in the age of emerging technologies. Interventions targeting moral disengagement warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

DeceptionMoralsPersonalityStudentsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41941508
PMCPMC13052905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.