ArticlePloS one2026
Managing Anaemia in Pregnancy with Traditional Medicines: Experiences of women in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaemia in pregnancy (AIP) is diagnosed when a pregnant woman's haemoglobin levels fall below 11g/dL. Globally, traditional medicines (TM) are widely used in the management of pregnancy-related conditions. This study aims to explore the experiences and management practices associated with the use of TMs to manage AIP. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative exploratory descriptive design was used to explore the experiences of pregnant women. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted among 18 pregnant women during their antenatal visits. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. The researchers developed a codebook and used NVIVO 12 to analyse the transcribed data. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: The women and their partners had lower socio-economic status (education, occupation and monthly income). The women selected for the study knew about the causes of AIP, including poor medication adherence and their inability to eat well. The women used TMs to manage AIP; however, they were concerned about the side effects on themselves and their fetuses. Although health workers discouraged the women from using TMs, family, friends, and communities encouraged their use.
conclusionThe women in this study perceived that traditional medicines could help manage AIPs, although they also reported concerns about adverse effects following use. Given the widespread accessibility of these remedies, further research is needed to clarify their safety, potential benefits, and appropriate use. Rather than outright discouragement, efforts should focus on strengthening supervised care and referral pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.