ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Trade-offs in diagnostic algorithm, population coverage, and duration of community screening for tuberculosis: A modelling study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent tuberculosis (TB) prevention and care strategies have failed to reduce disease burden at the pace required to meet global targets. Community screening may enable more rapid declines in TB burden, but evidence is limited. We used mathematical modelling to evaluate approaches using different diagnostic algorithms, population coverage, and duration of screening. METHODS AND
findingsWe used a deterministic compartmental TB model, which recognised symptomatic and asymptomatic infectious TB (defined by whether an individual reported symptoms at screening), as well as noninfectious TB. We simulated diagnostic algorithms targeting symptomatic infectious TB (prolonged cough with confirmatory Xpert Ultra), infectious TB (Xpert Ultra), or all TB (chest X-ray), and we varied population coverage and duration of screening. Main outcomes were estimated reduction in symptomatic TB incidence and TB mortality over a 10-year horizon. Maximum coverage (100%) and duration (five annual rounds) was projected to reduce symptomatic TB incidence by 26.9% (UI 22.8, 31.5%) with the algorithm targeting symptomatic TB and 74.0% (UI 68.5, 79.1%) with the algorithm targeting infectious TB. However, incidence rebounded at the end of screening, erasing 9.8% and 15.9%, respectively, of those reductions within 5 years. The algorithm targeting all TB showed higher potential for rapid reductions-over 98%-with negligible rebound; however, low diagnostic accuracy of current tools led to prohibitive overdiagnosis, with 7.2 false positives per true positive in a single round of screening. Screening algorithms targeting broader disease definitions (infectious or all TB) generally achieved greater impact with lower population coverage and/or duration. Findings were broadly similar for mortality. As a modelling study, our approach assumed a homogeneous population for simplicity and required assumptions where data were lacking around algorithm performance, treatment acceptance, and treatment completion across disease states.
conclusionsWe show that substantial reductions in TB morbidity and mortality can be achieved by community screening, highlighting the importance of symptom-agnostic algorithms and the need to balance population coverage and duration. To maximise and sustain epidemiological impact, accurate diagnostic tools and appropriate treatment regimens for individuals with noninfectious TB are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.