Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941481›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2026

Trade-offs in diagnostic algorithm, population coverage, and duration of community screening for tuberculosis: A modelling study.

Katherine C Horton, Alexandra S Richards, Alvaro Schwalb, Rein M G J Houben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine C HortonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-4065
Alexandra S RichardsSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9886-8104
Alvaro SchwalbDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-9719
Rein M G J HoubenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-7467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent tuberculosis (TB) prevention and care strategies have failed to reduce disease burden at the pace required to meet global targets. Community screening may enable more rapid declines in TB burden, but evidence is limited. We used mathematical modelling to evaluate approaches using different diagnostic algorithms, population coverage, and duration of screening. METHODS AND

findingsWe used a deterministic compartmental TB model, which recognised symptomatic and asymptomatic infectious TB (defined by whether an individual reported symptoms at screening), as well as noninfectious TB. We simulated diagnostic algorithms targeting symptomatic infectious TB (prolonged cough with confirmatory Xpert Ultra), infectious TB (Xpert Ultra), or all TB (chest X-ray), and we varied population coverage and duration of screening. Main outcomes were estimated reduction in symptomatic TB incidence and TB mortality over a 10-year horizon. Maximum coverage (100%) and duration (five annual rounds) was projected to reduce symptomatic TB incidence by 26.9% (UI 22.8, 31.5%) with the algorithm targeting symptomatic TB and 74.0% (UI 68.5, 79.1%) with the algorithm targeting infectious TB. However, incidence rebounded at the end of screening, erasing 9.8% and 15.9%, respectively, of those reductions within 5 years. The algorithm targeting all TB showed higher potential for rapid reductions-over 98%-with negligible rebound; however, low diagnostic accuracy of current tools led to prohibitive overdiagnosis, with 7.2 false positives per true positive in a single round of screening. Screening algorithms targeting broader disease definitions (infectious or all TB) generally achieved greater impact with lower population coverage and/or duration. Findings were broadly similar for mortality. As a modelling study, our approach assumed a homogeneous population for simplicity and required assumptions where data were lacking around algorithm performance, treatment acceptance, and treatment completion across disease states.

conclusionsWe show that substantial reductions in TB morbidity and mortality can be achieved by community screening, highlighting the importance of symptom-agnostic algorithms and the need to balance population coverage and duration. To maximise and sustain epidemiological impact, accurate diagnostic tools and appropriate treatment regimens for individuals with noninfectious TB are needed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMass ScreeningTuberculosisHumansIncidenceModels, TheoreticalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID41941481
PMCPMC13068317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.