ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Household and community-based approaches to malaria and cholera prevention: A narrative review with case studies from Uganda and Mozambique.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHousing conditions play a fundamental role in infectious diseases transmission, particularly in endemic regions. Structural modifications to homes-such as screened windows and doors, sealed eaves, elevated flooring, and insecticide-treated barriers-are increasingly recognized as key strategies for reducing mosquito entry and, consequently, malaria risk. Similarly, improved latrine, proper waste disposal, and the possibility to hand wash can help to reduce the spread of waterborne diseases such as cholera. However, their effectiveness and feasibility vary across geographical and socio-economic settings. This study examines the impact of housing-based interventions on malaria and cholera prevention through two case studies conducted in Uganda and Mozambique.
methodsA literature review was conducted alongside case studies from Uganda and Mozambique, where housing interventions for endemic infectious diseases prevention have been implemented. Data were collected from scientific literature, local health reports, and field observations.
resultsThe combination of multiple preventive measures at the community level, including both structural modifications to housing and changes in domestic behavior, holds great potential in combating various endemic diseases in low-income countries, such as malaria and cholera. These integrated strategies are generally low-cost, community-acceptable, and easily implementable, and can complement existing large-scale control programs.
conclusionHouse-based interventions represent a sustainable and complementary strategy for malaria and cholera control in endemic regions. However, their successful implementation depends on affordability, cultural adaptation, and integration with existing control programs. Future research should focus on scaling up these interventions and evaluating their long-term impact on vector- and water-borne diseases transmission in endemic and low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.