ArticlePloS one2026
Appreciating the complexity of frailty and user context in digital health intervention design: A qualitative study with personas.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty is a complex and dynamic process that is becoming increasingly common as the population ages. Early intervention has been shown to reverse or slow progression, but requires support from increasingly limited healthcare resources. Digital health interventions could potentially assist, but first it is vital to understand older adults' experiences and perspectives. This study describes feedback from older adults with symptoms of pre or early frailty on the design concept of a digital device intended to function as an adjunct to physiotherapy and occupational therapy by increasing frequency and quality of safe movement at home. Objectives were to better understand experiences of frailty, and to identify potential influencing factors on adoption and adherence. In-person audio-recorded qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 older adults and 5 carers recruited from community settings. Reflexive thematic analysis generated two themes: 'autonomy and prompts: importance of personalisation'; and 'digital interfaces and accountability: importance of usability and purpose'. In addition, three personas were generated from the data, each describing different needs and preferences for such a device. Situating the results of analysis in the context of current literature, a set of Guiding Principles was created to support future design development in this area. These highlight important factors for consideration when designing for this population, and provide key design feature suggestions and implementation strategies to address these factors including: ensuring the device has clear purpose; is adaptable to the diversity of needs within this clinical population; any form of feedback is safe, relevant, useful and rewarding to multiple users; and technical support is accessible and ongoing. It is recommended that the target population, and clinical purpose be more clearly defined within the healthcare context to encourage personal rehabilitation through enhancing the therapeutic alliance rather than focussing on individual behaviour change of diverse older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.