SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2026
Impact of CTO Revascularization on Sudden Cardiac Death and/or Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and/or ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CTO revascularization on SCD and/or VAs.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies evaluating the association between CTO revascularization and risk of SCD and/or VAs.
resultsSix studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The total sample size included 2,017 participants for the assessment of the primary outcome of interest and 868 participants for the assessment of the secondary outcome of interest. In 5 studies examining the association between CTO revascularization and risk of SCD and/or VAs, CTO revascularization was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of SCD and/or VAs (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.60; p = 0.50, I2 = 87%). Conversely, in 2 studies examining the association between IRA-CTO revascularization and risk of SCD and/or VAs, IRA-CTO revascularization was associated with 79% lower risk of SCD and/or VAs (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.43; p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). DISCUSSION: CTO revascularization overall was not associated with a lower risk of SCD and/or VAs. In contrast, IRA-CTO revascularization was associated with a lower risk of SCD and/or VAs. However, the study has several limitations, primarily due to the observational nature of the included studies.
conclusionSuccessful revascularization of an IRA-CTO should be attempted to reduce the burden of VAs and reduce the risk of SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.