Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941089›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2026

Accuracy and readability of LLM-generated responses for gout management: a benchmark study based on ACR guidelines.

Zhuhai Shao, Yiwen Zhang, Bingfei Cheng, Fang Zhang, Xuhua Zhu, Zhongchao Wang, Yangang Wang, Lili Xu, Zepeng Mu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhuhai Shao *Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yiwen Zhang *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Bingfei ChengDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Fang ZhangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xuhua ZhuQingdao West Coast New Area District Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Zhongchao WangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yangang WangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Lili XuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. qdunfmk@163.com.
Zepeng MuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. qdumzp@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4329-8670

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2023MH316Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2025QC963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGout and hyperuricemia, linked to purine metabolism abnormalities or impaired uric acid excretion, are rising with lifestyle changes. Effective self-management and health literacy are crucial for gout management. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in enhancing health management, their potential on gout patient education remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and readability of responses generated by three LLMs, including DeepSeek-V3, DeepSeek-R1, and GPT-5, to questions based on the gout and hyperuricemia guidelines published by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).

methodsBased on the ACR gout guidelines, a set of 42 questions was curated and submitted to three LLMs. Their responses were independently rated on a 5-point Likert scale by three expert gout and hyperuricemia specialists against the guidelines. Accuracy was rated as either an average score of ≥ 4 (low threshold) or 5 (high threshold). The readability of the responses was assessed by Microsoft Word, which provided metrics including the word count, character count, Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Automated Readability Index (ARI) were calculated.

resultsOur findings reveal that response accuracy was significantly higher for GPT-5 compared to DeepSeek-V3 (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between GPT-5 and DeepSeek-R1 (P > 0.05). In terms of readability, GPT-5 produced the most complex responses (FKGL: 12.89 ± 2.22, ARI: 14.87 ± 2.40), while DeepSeek-R1 generated the longest outputs.

conclusionLLMs show potential in generating responses that are consistent with clinical guidelines for gout management. The deployment of LLMs in gout patient education and clinical decision support necessitates the simultaneous optimization of both accuracy and readability. Key Points • This study is the first to systematically evaluate the agreement with ACR gout guidelines and readability of three state-of-the-art LLMs (DeepSeek-V3, DeepSeek-R1, GPT-5) in gout management, filling the gap of LLM benchmarking for gout patient education. • Response accuracy was significantly higher for GPT-5 compared to DeepSeek-V3, with no significant difference between GPT-5 and DeepSeek-R1. However, GPT-5 produced texts with the lowest readability. • The study innovatively combined expert-rated accuracy (5-point Likert scale by gout and hyperuricemia specialists) and objective readability metrics (FRE, FKGL, ARI), providing a comprehensive framework for assessing LLM utility in chronic disease self-management. • Findings confirm LLMs' potential for gout patient education but emphasize the need for simultaneous optimization of medical accuracy and health literacy, guiding future LLM refinement for clinical application.

Indexed as

GoutLarge Language ModelsPatient Education as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicRheumatologyBenchmarkingComprehensionHealth LiteracyHumansHyperuricemiaDeepSeekGout managementGPT-5Large language models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.