ArticleOdontology2026
Relationship between habitual chewing side and masticatory performance: a pilot study.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been few studies on the effect of Angle's classification of first molars on the difference in masticatory performance between the habitual chewing side (HCS) and the non-habitual chewing side (NHCS) in young people with healthy dentition. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the masticatory performance of the HCS and NHCS in individuals under 20 years of age with complete permanent dentition, divided into Class I and non-Class I first molar relationship groups (Class I group and non-Class I group). The participants were first- and second-year female dental hygiene students at the Nippon Dental University College in Niigata in 2024. Twenty-eight participants were classified into two groups based on the Angle's classification: Class I and non-Class I first molar relationships. HCS was determined using the cotton roll test, and masticatory performance was evaluated using glucose-containing gummy jelly. Participants were asked to chew a gummy jelly for 20 s on the HCS, and the amount of glucose extracted was measured as an indicator of masticatory performance. The same measurement was then performed on the NHCS. In the Class I group, the median (interquartile range, IQR) of the HCS was 202.00 (186.00-231.00) mg/dL and of the NHCS was 191.00 (120.50-238.50) mg/dL. In the non-Class I group, the HCS was 188.00 (140.00-225.00) mg/dL and the NHCS was 167.00 (156.00-235.00) mg/dL, respectively. A significant difference between the HCS and NHCS existed in the Class I group (p = 0.041), whereas not in the non-Class I group (p = 0.423). The null hypothesis of the study-that there is no difference in masticatory performance between HCS and NHCS, regardless of Angle's classification of the first molar relationship-was rejected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41941076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.