ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026
Advertising Ban in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Private Hospital Managers in Türkiye.
Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of advertising in healthcare is regulated strictly worldwide by ethical and legal regulations, yet its implications remain a matter of constant debate. This qualitative study examined the perceptions, approaches, and knowledge of private hospital managers in Istanbul concerning Türkiye’s healthcare advertising ban. In-depth interviews were used as the data collection method. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 12 managers working in private hospitals selected via purposive sampling. The participant group consisted of 4 general managers, 4 public relations managers, and 4 corporate communications and marketing manager. In terms of educational background, six participants held bachelor’s degrees, while the remaining six held postgraduate degrees. Data analysis was structured around an inductive thematic framework. As a result of the analysis, six main themes were identified: views on healthcare advertising bans; feelings about healthcare advertisements; views on healthcare advertising risks; willingness to advertise their own hospitals; knowledge of advertising regulations; comments on the distinction between promotion, information, and advertising. The findings indicated that most managers strongly support regulating healthcare advertising through legal frameworks. However, a major concern was identified as the uncontrolled rise of social media advertising and ethical breaches. Managers stressed that this trend complicates the distinction between advertising, promotion, and informational activities, thereby hindering patients’ access to accurate information. They emphasized that all hospital communication must strictly remain within ethical promotion and informational boundaries. Overall, the study highlights the critical importance of providers safeguarding patients’ right to accurate, unbiased information while avoiding misleading content. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers to establish a more ethical and transparent healthcare communication environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41941069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.