Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941030›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.

Mohamed H Zidan, Mohamed AlSayed, Mario Maged, Hashem Altabbaa, Abdalla M Hadhoud, Mahmoud Ashraf Hussein, Abedalrahman Yazan Aljarrah, Mohamed Hany, Ahmed Amgad, Mahmoud Albashier

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed H ZidanAlexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. mohamed.hessien1171@alexmed.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-356X
Mohamed AlSayedThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-7007
Mario MagedThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2817-7171
Hashem AltabbaaThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-838X
Abdalla M HadhoudThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1410-7680
Mahmoud Ashraf HusseinThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6582-4292
Abedalrahman Yazan AljarrahThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6254-2884
Mohamed HanyMadina Bariatric Center, Madina Women's Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-8112
Ahmed AmgadThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7907-1471
Mahmoud AlbashierThe Research Papyrus Lab, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7125-170X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) repair has gained increasing adoption in inguinal hernia surgery, yet its short-term clinical value relative to conventional laparoscopic TAPP (L-TAPP) remains debated. Although robotic platforms offer technical and ergonomic advantages, whether these translate into measurable patient-centered benefits is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated comparative evaluation of short-term safety, efficacy, economic impact, and surgeon workload between R-TAPP and L-TAPP. A systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 standards was conducted across five major databases from inception through September 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies involving adult patients undergoing R-TAPP or L-TAPP were included. The primary endpoint was chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Secondary outcomes comprised operative duration, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, recurrence, readmission, reoperation, urinary outcomes, surgical site infection, procedural costs, and surgeon workload assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, and pooled analyses were performed using random-effects models. Fourteen independent studies (3 randomized trials and 11 cohort studies) encompassing 5,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of chronic postoperative pain (n = 616) did not differ significantly between approaches (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.30–1.12; p = 0.11; I² = 0%). Robotic repair was associated with prolonged operative time (MD 10.93 min; 95% CI 4.18–17.67; p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences were observed in blood loss, hospital stay, overall morbidity, recurrence, readmission, reoperation, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, or surgical site infection. While total NASA-TLX scores were comparable, robotic surgery significantly reduced the surgeon’s physical workload. Procedural costs were consistently higher in the robotic cohort. R-TAPP provides short-term clinical outcomes comparable to L-TAPP but is associated with longer operative times and increased direct costs. Its principal advantage appears to lie in improved surgeon ergonomics rather than superior patient outcomes. Robotic repair may therefore be most appropriate in complex cases or high-volume centers with established expertise, whereas laparoscopic TAPP remains a cost-efficient standard for routine inguinal hernia repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeCost analysisInguinal herniaLaparoscopic surgeryL-TAPPMeta-analysisRobotic surgeryR-TAPPSurgeon ergonomicsSurgical outcomesSystematic reviewTransabdominal preperitoneal repair

Identifiers

PMID41941030
PMCPMC13053352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.