ReviewWorld journal of urology2026
Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate made practical: lessons from experts from the BEAM25 meeting.
Review in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) is the gold standard surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction irrespective of prostate size. However, numerous technical challenges may arise during EEP due to anatomical variability, patient-specific factors, and prior interventions. This study aims to summarize expert-derived surgical strategies to facilitate safe implementation of EEP and optimize outcomes in both novice and experienced surgeons.
methodsThis expert consensus paper is based on structured panel discussions held during the BEAM 2025 meeting. Recommendations were collected from international high-volume EEP surgeons, each with experience exceeding 1,000 procedures. Practical tips and strategies were compiled, reviewed, and approved by the expert panel, focusing on training, equipment, surgical technique, case selection, and management of complex scenarios. No formal Delphi or voting-based methodology was used; therefore, this manuscript reflects a structured expert-opinion consensus.
resultsKey recommendations include adopting an anatomical mindset distinct from resection techniques, structured training with full operating room team involvement, and appropriate equipment selection. Guidance is provided for managing the learning curve, optimizing patient counseling, maintaining anatomical orientation, and addressing technical challenges during enucleation and morcellation, particularly in large, small, or anatomically complex prostates. Strategies to prevent and manage common perioperative complications are also outlined.
conclusionExpert-driven practical guidance may shorten the EEP learning curve, enhance procedural safety, and improve functional outcomes. Adoption of these recommendations can support broader implementation of EEP in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41941011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.