ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
MGPP-DL: deep learning approach for material graph properties prediction.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe discovery of semiconductor materials for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications is limited by the computational cost of DFT calculations and the requirement for complete 3D crystal structures. Existing deep learning approaches, including graph neural networks (CGCNN, MEGNet, ALIGNN) and transformer architectures (Matformer, CrysCo), require structural information, limiting their applicability to hypothetical materials of which only the composition is known. We developed MGPP-DL (Materials Graph Property Prediction via Deep Learning), a structure-agnostic approach that predicts the band gap and formation energy directly from the chemical composition of the material structure. Evaluated on 389,000 materials from the Materials Project, MGPP-DL achieves unprecedented accuracy with mean absolute errors of 0.0178 eV/atom for formation energy and 0.0619 eV for band gap, representing a 67% improvement over state-of-the-art models. The model demonstrates a robust generalization (R
methodsChemical compositions are represented as graphs of completely connected elements with nodes encoding 33 elementary properties extracted via Pymatgen, including electronegativity, atomic radius, and stoichiometric coefficients. Three GNN layers with message passing refine the embeddings of elements (64-dimensional) by multi-scale aggregation. GNN output is processed by two EfficientNet blocks (dimension 128, expansion ratio 4) with squeeze-and-excitation attention mechanisms (reduction ratio 0.25). The training employed the optimizer Adam (learning rate 0.001), MSE loss, dropout (0.3), and batch standardization over 40 epochs (batch size 32). The Materials Project dataset (DFT-GGA, functional PBE) has been divided by scaffold methodology (70/15/15) to ensure structural diversity. IMPLEMENTATION: Python 3.10.12, TensorFlow 2.12.0/Keras (CUDA 11.8), trained on NVIDIA RTX 3080 GPU (10 GB VRAM), with Pymatgen 2023.8.10, NumPy 1.24.3, Pandas 2.0.3, Scikit-learn 1.3.0, Matplotlib 3.7.2, and Seaborn 0.12.2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41940997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.