ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Regional Differences Exist in Gender Representation Among GI Trainees and Faculty in the United States.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStudies show women are underrepresented in gastroenterology (GI). Understanding representation is crucial to improving representation. This study describes the geographic distribution of women in academic GI in the United States (US).
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 224 US GI fellowship programs in 2023 by review of program websites and direct inquiry. Gender distribution of trainees and faculty across US regions was evaluated. Program characteristics were examined in univariate analyses. Logistic regression models assessed factors associated with women in leadership, adjusting for program type and region.
resultsWomen comprised 39.3% of 1,801 fellows and 30.2% of 3,899 GI faculty. Percentage of women fellows was highest in the West (50%), Northeast (38%), South (33%), and Midwest (33%), (p = 0.014). Median percentage of senior women faculty was highest in the Northeast (27%) (p = 0.009). Programs with women GI division chiefs had more women GI fellowship program directors (60% vs 40%, p = 0.001) and higher median percentage of women faculty (33% vs 26%, p = 0.016). The presence of a woman GI division chief was independently associated with having a woman GI fellowship program director (p = 0.008) and increased percentage of women faculty (p < 0.001).
conclusionGender representation varied regionally, with some institutions lacking women faculty or trainees. Women in leadership are associated with greater faculty gender diversity, potentially impacting trainee recruitment, faculty retention, and patient care. The association between women GI division chiefs and increased women faculty and program directors highlights how leadership gender diversity may support recruitment and retention of women in academic GI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41940888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.