Trial reportDiabetes care2026
Estimating the True MACE Benefits From Tirzepatide in SURPASS-CVOT Using an Imputed Placebo Analysis of REWIND.
Trial report in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists by Kidney Function: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Including the SOUL Trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Disease-modifying anti-diabetic drugs (DMADDs): bridging the SIMPLE approach to disease interception.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Real-World vs. Randomized Trial Evidence for Incretin-Based Therapies: A Narrative Review.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- Beyond glycemic control: clinical cardiovascular effects of tirzepatide-a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn prespecified analyses, the treatment effect for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) of tirzepatide compared with imputed placebo was estimated using SURPASS-Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (SURPASS-CVOT) and Researching Cardiovascular Events With a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe indirect comparison with placebo was conducted for primary (MACE-3) and secondary outcomes of SURPASS-CVOT. The analysis included data from REWIND participants who would have been eligible for SURPASS-CVOT and all participants from SURPASS-CVOT. Propensity score estimation was used to adjust for differences in participant characteristics between studies. The indirect analysis of the treatment effect was derived by multiplying the hazard ratio (HR) for MACE-3 between tirzepatide and dulaglutide in SURPASS-CVOT by the HR for dulaglutide versus placebo in REWIND. Sensitivity analyses were performed using unadjusted analyses, including both the selected REWIND and the entire REWIND populations, and adjusted analysis in the entire REWIND population. Post hoc sensitivity analyses used data from a recent glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) meta-analysis that included REWIND.
resultsAnalyses included 2,055 of 9,901 participants from REWIND and all 13,165 participants from SURPASS-CVOT. In indirect treatment effect comparisons, tirzepatide versus placebo was associated with lower MACE-3 (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55, 0.94), death from CV cause or heart failure events (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51, 0.96), and all-cause death (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.45, 0.82). Sensitivity analyses, including nonadjusted or the entire REWIND cohort data or meta-analysis data for GLP-1RAs, were generally consistent.
conclusionsIn this indirect prespecified exploratory comparison, tirzepatide compared with imputed placebo was associated with reduced CV outcomes and all-cause mortality in participants with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic CV disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.