Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940792›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2026

On optimisation of Paganin's method for propagation-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging and tomography.

Timur E Gureyev, David M Paganin, Ashkan Pakzad, Harry M Quiney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timur E GureyevSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
David M PaganinSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ashkan PakzadSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Harry M QuineySchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2011204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paganin's method for image reconstruction in propagation-based phase-contrast X-ray imaging and tomography has enjoyed broad acceptance in recent years, with over one thousand publications citing its use. The present paper discusses approaches to optimisation of the method with respect to simple image quality metrics, such as signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution, as well as a reference-based metric corresponding to the relative mean squared difference between the reconstructed image and the 'ground truth' image that would be obtained in a setup with perfect spatial resolution and no noise. The problem of optimisation of the intrinsic regularisation parameter of Paganin's method with respect to spatial resolution in the reconstructed image is studied in detail. It is also demonstrated that a combination of Paganin's method with a Tikhonov-regularised deconvolution of the point-spread function of the imaging system can provide significantly higher image quality compared to the standard version of the method. Analytical expressions for some relevant image quality metrics are obtained and compared with results of numerical simulations. Advantages and shortcomings of optimisation approaches using a number of different image quality metrics are discussed. The results of this study are expected to be useful in practical X-ray imaging and in training of machine learning models for image denoising and segmentation.

Indexed as

computed tomographyimage qualityphase contrastX‐ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID41940792
PMCPMC13280201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.