ArticleJournal of vision2026
The development of object representations in children.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensitivity to length and angle information develops early in PPA, but late in OPA.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objects in scenes follow a hierarchical organization, with "scenes" at the top level, followed by "phrases", clusters of objects that share spatial and functional proximity. Within these phrases, "anchor" objects help predict the identity and location of smaller, dependent "local" objects. Previous research has shown that this hierarchy is reflected in the mental representations of objects in adults. The current study examined whether children's object representations already reflect this hierarchy. We implemented an odd-one-out task with 36 object images to collect pairwise similarity ratings from children ages 5 to 10 years. Two different groups of children received different similarity judgment instructions: One group received no explicit definition of similarity, but the other was told to base similarity on actions typically performed with the objects. We created a priori and data-driven scene hierarchy measures to evaluate how well they aligned with children's similarity judgments. Results showed that children's representations were clearly structured at the scene level, as indicated by strong effects in both hierarchy measures. In contrast, we found no reliable phrase-level effects and only a small data-driven object-type effect. Scene-level structure strengthened with age, whereas phrase- and object-type levels showed no reliable age-related change. Importantly, similarity patterns were highly comparable across both tasks, suggesting that children's object representations by default seem to be action based. These results suggest that children organize objects along the scene level of the hierarchy incorporating actions related to the objects in their representations, whereas finer-grained relations are more weakly represented and may be more difficult to detect reliably at this age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.