ArticleScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2026
From secondary special needs education to the labor market: latent trajectories and inequalities in employment participation.
Article in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIndividuals with disabilities continue to face barriers to labor market inclusion. The transition from secondary special needs education plays a critical role in shaping long-term employment outcomes. Early labor market disparities are particularly concerning given their lasting impact on health and well-being. This study aims to: (i) assess employment participation after leaving special needs education, (ii) identify distinct employment trajectories, and (iii) examine how gender and migration background are associated with these trajectories.
methodsThis longitudinal study used national registry data from Statistics Netherlands to examine employment outcomes among individuals transitioning from secondary education between 2016 and 2023, with focus on those in special needs education. Employment status was available monthly for up to seven years post-transition. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied separately for each educational track within secondary special needs education to identify patterns of labor market participation over time. Gender and migration background were subsequently examined as predictors of trajectory group membership using multinomial logistic regression models.
resultsEmployment participation after seven years was substantially lower among former special needs education students (10-53% across tracks) than among those from regular 'practice-based' education (70%). After special needs education, employment participation was initially highest among individuals transitioning from the 'labor market integration' track, but plateaued around 45%. In contrast, graduates from the 'post-secondary education' track, primarily aimed at continued studies, showed steady improvement, leading to better long-term employment outcomes (53%). Within each educational track, 3-5 distinct latent employment trajectories were identified. Post-hoc analyses indicated that women and individuals with a migration background were consistently more likely to follow less favorable patterns.
conclusionEducational pathways alone do fully not account for labor market disparities. Outcomes are shaped by the intersection of education and identity characteristics. These findings highlight the need for individualized vocational support and deliberate, equity-focused guidance during educational transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.