ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Diagnosis of High Intracranial Pressure by Non-Optic Nerve Retinal Image Features.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the performance of an artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model compared with neuro-ophthalmologists for the classification of subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects, based on retinal images with and without masking the optic nerve heads (ONHs). Methods: Widefield retinal images were obtained in 32 subjects (70 images) with elevated ICP and papilledema and 31 control subjects (62 images). ONH-unmasked images were generated by cropping the image to a 30° circular region. ONH-masked images were generated by masking the ONH and peripapillary region. Classification was performed using a convolutional neural network model and by two neuro-ophthalmologists (graders). Results: For the ONH-unmasked images, the classification accuracies of the model, grader 1, and grader 2 were 83% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.94), 93%, and 86%, respectively. For the ONH-masked images, the classification accuracies of the model, grader 1, and grader 2 were 79% (AUC = 0.90), 66%, and 76%, respectively. The classification performance of the DL model and graders did not significantly differ for both datasets (P ≥ 0.38). There was no significant effect of ONH masking on the performance of the DL model (P = 1.0) and grader 2 (P = 0.38), whereas the performance of grader 1 was significantly reduced (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Both expert graders and the DL models demonstrated excellent performance for classifying retinal images of subjects with elevated and normal ICP using images with or without masking the ONH. Translational Relevance: Methods for assessment of non-optic nerve retinal image features have the potential to improve diagnosis and monitoring the progression and response to treatment of elevated ICP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.