Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940687›Full record

ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026

Premature Infants With Pulmonary Complications Exhibit Decreased Skin Maturity Early After Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Samanta Cris Monteiro Frota, Luiza Eduarda Silva de Macedo, Larissa Queiroz Oliveira, Ingrid Fonseca Damasceno Bezerra, Anna Christina do Nascimento Granjeiro Barreto, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, APPLE Consortium, Roberta Lins Gonçalves, Daniele Soares-Marangoni, Gabriela Silveira Neves and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samanta Cris Monteiro FrotaJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Luiza Eduarda Silva de MacedoJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Larissa Queiroz OliveiraJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ingrid Fonseca Damasceno BezerraJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Anna Christina do Nascimento Granjeiro BarretoJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ingrid Guerra AzevedoVicerrectoría Académica - Universidad Católica de Temuco, La Araucanía, Temuco, Chile.
APPLE Consortium
Roberta Lins GonçalvesFederal University of Amazonas and Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Manaus and Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Daniele Soares-MarangoniFederal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-5456
Gabriela Silveira NevesHospital Sophia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Carolina Daniel de Lima-AlvarezJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-2937
Silvana Alves PereiraJanuario Cicco Teaching Maternity, Brazilian Hospital Services Company (EBSERH), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-2837

Funding

The APPLE study was supported by CAPES, CNPq, UFAM, HUGV/UFAM/EBSERH, FAPEAM, UFRN, UFMS, Hospital Sofia Feldman, Universidad Autónoma de Honduras, and funded by Birthtech® Dispositivos para a Saúde Ltda, and Grand Challenges Canada [R-TTS-2309-60401], which supports Bold Ideas with Great Impact® R-TTS-2309-60401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly identification of respiratory risk in preterm newborns (PTNB) remains challenging, as direct assessment of pulmonary maturity is often unavailable or requires invasive or resource-intensive methods. Non-invasive biomarkers capable of indicating physiological maturity shortly after birth could improve early clinical decision-making in neonatal care. Because skin and lung development share common biological pathways, skin maturity assessed by optical reflectance may serve as an indirect marker of pulmonary development.

objectiveThis study evaluated the association between skin maturity estimated by skin reflectance and respiratory outcomes in PTNB during the first 48 hours of life.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with PTNB born admitted within 48?h. Exclusion criteria included cutaneous malformations, or conditions interfering with dermal assessment. Skin maturity was measured using the non-invasive Preemie-Test® device. Respiratory outcomes, such as chest radiographic abnormalities, pneumothorax, atelectasis, and pulmonary hemorrhage, were defined by clinical and radiological criteria.

resultsA total of 82 PTNB were included, 54.9% male. Skin reflectance ranged from 0.9 to 2.1?nm. Lower skin maturity was significantly associated with radiographic abnormalities (p = 0.01), pneumothorax (p = 0.01), pulmonary hemorrhage (p = 0.01), atelectasis (p = 0.01), and need for invasive ventilation (p = 0.01).

conclusionsThese findings suggest skin reflectance may serve as a rapid, objective, and non?invasive screening tool for neonatal respiratory risk.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureLungLung DiseasesSkinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal Intensive Careneonatal respiratory distress syndromepreterm newbornskin

Identifiers

PMID41940687
PMCPMC13051638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.