ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2026
Can We Breed Microbiomes to Sustain Plant Productivity?
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global food systems face challenges from population growth, shifting diets and climate change. While decades of plant-centric breeding and high-input agriculture have generated high yielding crops, this strategy has unintentionally reshaped the plant associated microbiomes, often coinciding with a depletion of their functional diversity. We revisit these breeding strategies and propose extending breeding targets beyond the plant genome to include the plant microbiome. In this regard, resistance breeding shows, albeit unintended, that plant genetics shape the microbiome: by narrowing the genetic base, we have selected for highly specialised pathogenic microbiomes. This raises a key question: can we intentionally apply the same principle to select for beneficial microbiomes? To answer this question, a thorough insight into microbial community architecture, hubs and functional redundancy is key. We outline two complementary avenues: (i) rewilding to restore ancestral microbial partners and (ii) microbiome breeding guided by QTL/GWAS mapped host loci that gate microbial recruitment, immune filtering and exudate composition. This approach comprises the integration of trait-based phenotyping, multi-omics, network-informed SynCom design and field testing across environments to capture G × E × M (genotype × environment × microbiome) interactions. Treating the microbiome as a selectable, designable and heritable trait can convert small gains into durable long-lasting crop resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.