Accuracy of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Risk of Recurrence in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: During the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), detecting the risk of its recurrence in an early phase is still challenging. Recent studies have investigated the radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models for detecting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC. However, there is still insufficient systematic evidence to prove its efficiency. Objective: This study is designed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics-based ML in predicting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC, aiming to provide evidence-based support for the subsequent development of scoring tools to forecast recurrence risk. Methods: For acquiring research on radiomics-based models for forecasting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were systematically retrieved, up to October 24, 2025. Studies on analyzing the recurrence of NSCLC using radiomics-based ML were included, while those in which only texture analysis was conducted or radiomics-based ML was not constructed were excluded. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was used to appraise the eligible studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the variables of the model, the background of treatment, the stage of lung cancer, and the pathological type. Results: Ultimately, 30 eligible studies in total were included, covering 7964 patients with NSCLC. According to the meta-analysis, the c-index of radiomics-based ML models for forecasting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC was 0.850 (95% CI 0.834-0.866, 95% prediction interval [PI] 0.623-1.004) in the training set. Specifically, the pooled c-index was 0.876 (95% CI 0.853-0.900) among the patients receiving the stereotactic body radiation therapy and 0.825 (95% CI 0.804-0.848) among those who received surgeries combined with other adjuvant treatment regimens. The c-index of the radiomics-based ML models combined with clinical features for forecasting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC was 0.833 (95% CI 0.822-0.854, 95% PI 0.717-0.945) in the training set. In contrast, the c-index of radiomics-based ML models for forecasting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC was 0.878 (95% CI 0.854-0.902, 95% PI 0.681-1.000) in the validation set. The c-index of radiomics-based ML models combined with clinical features for forecasting the risk of recurrence in NSCLC was 0.854 (95% CI 0.830-0.878, 95% PI 0.655-0.992) in the validation set. The average RQS across the included studies was 27.4%, revealing methodological limitations and an absence of standardization. Conclusions: This study is the first to confirm that radiomics-based ML models effectively predict the risk of recurrence in NSCLC. This study provides evidence-based support for the subsequent development or updating of radiomics-based ML models. However, the current methodological application of radiomics remains concerning. Therefore, in the future, research should standardize the workflow for implementing radiomics-based ML and incorporate multicenter imaging data to enhance its generalizability.