ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Cleaning ability of reciprocation and rotation motions in conjunction with either continuous or sequential chelation: An SEM study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Recent advancements have introduced a debate over the most effective combination of file kinematics and irrigation timing. While continuous rotation and reciprocation motions each offer distinct advantages in debris extrusion and file safety, their synergistic effect with different chelation protocols remains a critical area of investigation. Aims: The aim was to evaluate the cleaning performance of reciprocation and continuous motions in combination with continuous versus sequential chelation irrigation protocols. Subjects and Methods: Sixty single-rooted single-canalled teeth were prepared and divided into two groups according to the type of file used ( Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Results: In all the groups, the coronal third had significantly cleaner dentinal tubules ( Conclusions: The cleaning abilities of the OC and OR file systems are comparable. Sequential chelation resulted in cleaner and more open dentinal tubules regardless of the file system used. Continuous chelation with reciprocation yielded cleaner canals than with rotation motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.